Punem sexena-According to a research discussion male sex more than women, but the women would discuss the subject if they hear it is really funny than men do far more comprehensive and thoughtful use of language.
Manchester University led a team of psychologists Jiyofree BT male and female talks the 56 studies reviewed. According to the Daily Mail, BT found that 24 men used more words every day.
BT then used his own recording of conversations on various subjects 50. He then volunteers have a script that every fifth word was missing and he asked them to fill up these words.
He said that the words spoken by women because they were difficult to predict uses of language are far more cautiously.
For example, to praise men 'brilliant' and 'good' use of such words, which supposedly can be easily mounted. Thus in general will be praised by men today, you sure look good.
Contrast, the type will offer women the same thing - 'I'm really loving your jacket. Where you bought it? "Overall men's words, estimated 81 percent could be imposed on occasions, while 71 percent of women in the case number. :
by- punem sexena-Dhaka .. ICC Cricket World Cup on Thursday's historic Bangabandhu -2011
The stadium was fantastic debut. Decorated like a bride in the stadium
In addition to all 14 teams, players and officials of Bangladesh PM
Sheikh Hasina, ICC President Sharad Pawar and many dignitaries of world cricket
Opening Ceremony attended.
India, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh are going to be joint host cricket's
Mahaayojan security in the capital of Bangladesh has been ready. 43
Day-long event during the three countries at 13 venues
Total 51 matches will be played.
135 minutes during the colorful opening ceremony will be performed.
Beginning of the program of Bangladesh national 'Amar Sonar Bangla ... " Resulted from.
After this song, music, dance and fascinating series of laser show began.
Different countries come to the venue team captains sitting in a rickshaw. Colorful
Stadium to watch the opening ceremony was attended by over 40,000 people. punumsexesena@gmail.com
BY-Punem sexena-New Delhi. BJP President Nitin Gadkari today rejected outright the possibility that the 2 - G
Spectrum allocation in the recent statements about the party leader Arun Shourie, no action
Can be.
Gadkari said that Shorey will not act on. Interestingly, Shourie said during an interview
Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha that he long ago the Leader of Opposition in Rajya Sabha Sushma Swaraj and
Arun Jaitley 2 - G spectrum allocation, but he was informed about the scandal in Parliament
Raise their suggestion was not considered.
Shourie's statement said the BJP Akadne has already started the party on the issue
Parliament has been taking. Asked whether the BJP is still a member Shourie, Gadkari said
Course. Shourie party members and leaders.
Shourie was telecommunications minister in the NDA Government. They now 2 - G spectrum scandal investigation in connection with
Is to appear before the CBI on February 21 punemxesesena@gmail.com
Tweet punem sexena=Priyadarshini Mattoo and her murderer Kumar Singh (son of a senior IPS Officer), or the child Ruchika Girhotra and her tormentor DGP Rathore or Jessica Lal and her cold-blooded murderer Manu Sharma (son of an MP) - all the accused were originally either acquitted (like Singh and Manu Sharma) or treated leniently by the lower courts (like Rathore). It would be naïve to believe that if the higher courts subsequently corrected these original injustices, the public outcry against the injustices, ably projected by the media, had no role to play in bringing these crooks to book.
The fact is these accused were also guilty of something very very serious, but the lower courts did make mistakes in letting them get away or nearly so, some of them even attracting strictures from the higher courts. Public opinion did force the higher courts to take a more careful view of these cases and reverse some of the decisions. Maybe a social worker of long standing in the area, Dr. Binayak Sen - even if guilty of being a courier of seditious Maoist literature - being awarded life sentence and now denied bail, may be a victim of disproportionately harsh treatment, just as the earlier named accused were beneficiaries of disproportionately soft judgments. If this is the case, can public opinion not play a part in correcting this?I genuinely wonder what would have happened if the members of public had taken a phlegmatic stand in the judgments of the lower courts in the cases of Ruchika or Priyanka. Would the higher courts have been sufficiently jolted into taking a harder look at those cases and bringing the accused who nearly got away to speedy justice? The public wasn't fully apprised of all the facts about the cases of Singh, Manu Sharma or Rathore and the public does not have full facts about the case involving Binayak Sen. But that hardly means based on publicly available information, we cannot speak out for those whom we believe may have been victims of excessive treatment at the hands of justice, just as some have been beneficiaries of opposite treatment.
punemsexesena@gmail.com
Tweetby=punem sexenaIndia’s World Cup campaign might just have started on the wrong foot, when Praveen Kumar was declared injured and out. Not that the medium-pacer is irreplaceable, but it is never a good sign when you have to call in a substitute even before the tournament has started.
S Sreesanth is indeed an able candidate to step in for Praveen and had his attitude not been an issue, he might have been in the squad in the first place. Yet, the loss is a jarring note for India in the run-up to the World Cup.
That, however, does little to dent the ‘favourites’ status that India enjoy, with a line-up that boasts of Sachin Tendulkar, Virender Sehwag and Gautam Gambhir. Incidentally, all three have been on the injured list this year.
Has there been an overdose of cricket for Team India before the World Cup? Let’s hope not. Roger Binny hinted so, recently and hoped that the bowlers would remain fit throughout the tournament. True, a good batting show would have to be backed up by a fitting bowling performance. The likes of Zaheer Khan have suffered breakdowns in the past. We can only hope the ghost of excess cricket does not come back to haunt India.
Talking about injuries, Mahendra Singh Dhoni has great confidence in his fitness, brushing aside suggestions that a second wicketkeeper might have proved useful. A second wicketkeeper is always an unnecessary baggage if the first choice remains fit throughout. But then, in case Dhoni gets injured (God forbid), what happens? Do we see Sehwag donning the gloves? Will he be able to do the job? South Africa can do without a second wicketkeeper as they have AB de Villiers, who can comfortably stand behind the wickets if required. India, unfortunately, do not have that luxury. Wicketkeeping is a specialist job and you just can’t expect a Sehwag or a Gambhir take up that role without any reluctance.
But then, didn’t Rahul Dravid do it under Sourav Ganguly? Dada, like Dhoni, wanted some flexibility in the team composition and used Dravid behind the wickets to give himself some extra options. The Wall might not have relished the role, but stood up when it counted. Maybe he was no Nayan Mongia, but he did give his skipper that option to include an extra batsman or a bowler when required.
Dispensing of a second wicketkeeper gives Dhoni that flexibility, and he used that to add an extra spinner to his basket. On the sub-continent wickets, an additional spinner at your disposal does give you some more variety, but then perhaps it does compromise the team’s position in case of injuries.
India have many part-time spinning options, apart from the frontliners. However, what they don’t have are the replacements for the likes of Zaheer and Dhoni. If any of the key players are forced to miss out on a game or two, India might have a problem at hand. But then, Dhoni’s confidence is infectious. Millions of Indians believe he won’t need a back-up. Let’s hope for India’s sake, they are right.
Democracy is flawed. How else would you explain the perverted incentive system that plagues democracies? We call this plague corruption. The Lok Sabha election of 2009 costa whopping Rs. 10,000 crore (1.8 billion USD). That makes Indian election $ 200 million more expensive than the American elections. Of this exorbitant amount, election candidates are expected to raise Rs. 4,350 crore. Now how does an MP whose annual salary was recently raised to Rs. 20 lakhs a year do that?
Assuming that an MP saves100% of his/her salary (which he/she could easily do considering the various amenities he/she receives), it will amount to Rs. 1 crore. Of the Rs 1 crore, MPs have to donate to the party fund and run their own campaign. Simple math tells me that the demand for money far exceeds the supply of salary. Now is it as surprising to see or hear about corruption?
In Indian politics, the rise of big money is relatively new. But the perception of political leaders being affiliated to business remains morally blasphemous in society. While fundraising isn’t illegal in India, it highly discouraged in our social practices. Instead, when businesses approach political leaders, it has to be in the shady night. The consequence: 2G scandal.
Undoubtedly the Rs 3,000 crore that A. Raja pocketed from the scam was wrong but from an economists perspective it was only a matter of time before cabinet ministers and political leaders started engaging in corrupt behavior. Seeking financial support from business houses is not regulated and therefore a political leader can exploit the system. Similarly businesses too, can ask for the sky from political leaders. Inevitably political leaders swindle away hundreds of crores, unworthy businesses houses makes hundreds of crores while the country loses thousands of crores.
In Florida, when I worked for a state Senator, I came across a solution to this problem. It was called lobbying. For all practical purposes lobbying can be thought of as controlled corruption. Businesses register as interest groups and approach political leaders with their plans. Any transaction that takes place between the politician and the lobbyist is recorded and made available upon request. You don’t see hoards of money floating around because interactions are regulated (or American politicians are particularly good at hiding the money). This doesn’t mean that America isn’t haunted by lobbying issues but they are better at dealing with it. A World Bank economist commented on the current corruption crisis by saying “even greed needs to regulated.”
In India, regulated lobbying doesn’t exist. When news breaks about corruption there is chaos.
Eventually, individuals like Nira Radia are identified. They are mocked till the next scandal emerges. Rather than identifying the core issues and dealing with them, we are often taken aback by the audacity of political leaders to ally with business houses. Is it that big of a surprise to know that the major industrialists of India employ a group of people to lobby politicians at all time? Maybe it is time to take corruption out of the murky undergrounds, exposed it to the daylight of regulation and recognize that money and politics will also be intermingled. It is about time to regulate this phenomenon so that such high level exploitation does not occur.
The more central issue when discussing corruption is also our expectation from political leaders and public servants. A political leader has tremendous power and to counter that we have placed checks and balances internally and externally so that we can ensure power is not misused. However, how do we incentivize the individual not to exploit their position? After all, elected officials and selected IS officers spend a lot of time and energy to get in to office and recognize that they have only a limited time in office. So wouldn’t they want to make hay while there is still light? Could a similar regulation like lobbying even combat corruption to its fullest? Or is it time to renounce the democracy and come up with the next best political system?
punemsexesena@gmail.com
Punem sexena-According to a research discussion male sex more than women, but the women would discuss the subject if they hear it is really funny than men do far more comprehensive and thoughtful use of language.
